<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Learning programs and students of the 21st Century….</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.brettmoller.com/2006/02/15/learning-programs-and-students-of-the-21st-century%e2%80%a6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.brettmoller.com/2006/02/15/learning-programs-and-students-of-the-21st-century%e2%80%a6/</link> <description>Technology Resources for Educators</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 03:25:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator> <item><title>By: Graham Wegner</title><link>http://blog.brettmoller.com/2006/02/15/learning-programs-and-students-of-the-21st-century%e2%80%a6/#comment-82</link> <dc:creator>Graham Wegner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 01:59:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brettmoller.com/?p=81#comment-82</guid> <description>Thanks for finding my comment. I was a bit mystified as to where it went and I was a bit disappointed as I wanted to expand on my points in my own blog but what I had written to you here had completely flown my mind. So much of what you are talking about relates to Marc Prensky&#039;s point of view. He was here in Adelaide and while I would never subscribe to one person only&#039;s point of view about where we are all heading, he provokes heaps of things to consider when in the business of engaging students. Check out my links at &lt;a href=&quot;http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/02/28/prensky-prensky-and-more-prensky/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Prensky, Prensky and More Prensky&lt;/a&gt; as well as my notes from his seminar last Friday - &lt;a href=&quot;http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/03/03/marc-prensky-in-adelaide-seminar/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Marc Prensky in Adelaide Seminar Pt 1&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/03/05/marc-prensky-in-adelaide-seminar-pt-2/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Part 2&lt;/a&gt;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for finding my comment. I was a bit mystified as to where it went and I was a bit disappointed as I wanted to expand on my points in my own blog but what I had written to you here had completely flown my mind. So much of what you are talking about relates to Marc Prensky&#8217;s point of view. He was here in Adelaide and while I would never subscribe to one person only&#8217;s point of view about where we are all heading, he provokes heaps of things to consider when in the business of engaging students. Check out my links at <a href="http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/02/28/prensky-prensky-and-more-prensky/" rel="nofollow">Prensky, Prensky and More Prensky</a> as well as my notes from his seminar last Friday &#8211; <a href="http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/03/03/marc-prensky-in-adelaide-seminar/" rel="nofollow">Marc Prensky in Adelaide Seminar Pt 1</a> and <a href="http://gwegner.edublogs.org/2006/03/05/marc-prensky-in-adelaide-seminar-pt-2/" rel="nofollow"> Part 2</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bmoller</title><link>http://blog.brettmoller.com/2006/02/15/learning-programs-and-students-of-the-21st-century%e2%80%a6/#comment-81</link> <dc:creator>bmoller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:42:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brettmoller.com/?p=81#comment-81</guid> <description>A great comment from graham.wegner@lnps.sa.edu.au that somehow I accidently deleted....  so here it is....  Sorry Graham You&#039;re dead right, it isn&#039;t the tool that engages the student, it is the quality of the content that is accessed via that tool. Ay my school, we are implementing an IWB program and one of the boards was partially funded by a Science action research grant. Our Science teacher did a bit of measurement with the upper primary students who commented that the IWB was &quot;alright&quot; but if the science activities and simulations shown were of a high quality, then that would be &quot;excellent.&quot; And your use of the word entertainment does not need to imply that it can&#039;t be important concept and content wise. People like Adam Spencer and Dr.Karl are entertaining but their content is science and maths. Teachers have to make the shift that maybe they need to facilitate quality content from various sources and experts, instead of relying on themselves as &quot;stand up educators&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great comment from <a href="mailto:graham.wegner@lnps.sa.edu.au">graham.wegner@lnps.sa.edu.au</a> that somehow I accidently deleted&#8230;.  so here it is&#8230;.  Sorry Graham<br /> You&#8217;re dead right, it isn&#8217;t the tool that engages the student, it is the quality of<br /> the content that is accessed via that tool. Ay my school, we are implementing an IWB<br /> program and one of the boards was partially funded by a Science action research<br /> grant. Our Science teacher did a bit of measurement with the upper primary students<br /> who commented that the IWB was &#8220;alright&#8221; but if the science activities and<br /> simulations shown were of a high quality, then that would be &#8220;excellent.&#8221; And your<br /> use of the word entertainment does not need to imply that it can&#8217;t be important<br /> concept and content wise. People like Adam Spencer and Dr.Karl are entertaining but<br /> their content is science and maths. Teachers have to make the shift that maybe they<br /> need to facilitate quality content from various sources and experts, instead of<br /> relying on themselves as &#8220;stand up educators&#8221;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://blog.brettmoller.com/2006/02/15/learning-programs-and-students-of-the-21st-century%e2%80%a6/#comment-80</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:14:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brettmoller.com/?p=81#comment-80</guid> <description>Think I might have sent you this link before, but it&#039;s certainly related to ways of engaging the 21st century learner... check out Kathy Sierra&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_users/2006/01/crash_course_in.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Crash Course in Learning Theory&lt;/a&gt;. Has some excellent points about motivation, fun, as well as using variety and surprise...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think I might have sent you this link before, but it&#8217;s certainly related to ways of engaging the 21st century learner&#8230; check out Kathy Sierra&#8217;s <a href="http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_users/2006/01/crash_course_in.html" rel="nofollow">Crash Course in Learning Theory</a>. Has some excellent points about motivation, fun, as well as using variety and surprise&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 394/398 objects using memcached

Served from: blog.brettmoller.com @ 2012-02-11 00:29:48 -->
